Where Buddhism Meets Gendlin

Author: Christopher Page 3 of 4

The Mind-Made Body (manomayakaya)

It is interesting that we Western teachers pass over this teaching. I have never heard a talk by a Western teacher on the ‘Mind-Made Body.’ My earliest experiences with meditation, back in 1967, immediately connected me with the fact that the way I experienced my body – at that time, in terms of size, space and light – was a dependent arising. (I wouldn’t have used that phrase then, but that’s what I was recognising, just the same.) It was a dependent arising that depended on ‘coming in there,’ so to speak. That is, it depended on my doing something to break the habits of waking mind’s version of the body-mind. That something was to sit the body down somewhere and stay put for a while. In my early days the sittings were confined to about twenty minutes, twenty minutes sitting in one spot. But the kind of body I had/was, in that twenty minutes, went through some very dramatic variations. I was stunned to realise that the body was so variable.

I think this was the beginning of the realisation that it might be possible to cultivate a subtle body. The Buddha’s practice (as presented in the Pali Nikayas) clearly states that mastery of the mind-made body is an important stage of the inner work. In later teachings (e.g. the Lankavatara Sutra) it is referred to as the Will-body. An example in the Pali Nikayas is in the Digha Nikaya – in the Samaññaphala Sutta (the ‘Fruits of Reclusehood’). (See Maurice Walshe’s translation, for example, or Thanissaro’s at http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/dn/dn.02.0.than.html.)

I think too much is made about the supernatural feats that are supposed to come for one who has mastered this part of the contemplative life. I think the promise for me is in the integration (after the split) – or the holism (in the reality) – of emptiness with form, spirit with a worldly life, citta with a ‘worldly’ body. It also involves seeing that we have created our body out of our explorations of our contact with the environment (more on dependent arising), and that the body is not fixed, but in constant flux with the environment (continually dependently arising). So, it’s important for me that the ‘mind-made body’ is not about escaping embodiment, but about making embodiment more real.

The Body Lives Our Desire Life

I enjoyed reading Will JOhnson’s little book, Posture of Meditaion Anyhow, this came from Tricycle;s Daily Dharma, today:

Forget the body, what we all need to work on is our minds, right? Not necessarily, says Will Johnson, who emphasizes that negative patterns exist in the body as well as the mind:

“The teachings tell us that actions disturb our peace of mind, but what I’m suggesting is that we can’t just look to what we conventionally call our mind to sort this out. Reaction, clinging, and aversion are physical actions that the body performs and that, no matter how subtle, create muscular tension through the repeated motions of either “pulling toward” (desire) or “pushing away” (aversion). Repeat anything often enough, and you create holding patterns in the body that predispose you to continue doing that action.”

Read “Full Body, Empty Mind,” from the Fall 2007 issue of Tricycle, which includes three body-oriented exercises from author Will Johnson.

Deathless

Mindfulness directed to the body is no small thing, in the Buddha’s dispensation:

“They have not comprehended the Deathless who have not comprehended mindfulness directed to the body. They have comprehended the Deathless who have comprehended mindfulness directed to the body.” (AN.I.xxi)

Pain

It’s been a difficult few weeks for this body – a lot of pain; yet, the mindfulness has never left me. I’m so grateful for those who have introduced me to the practice.

“If one thing, O [Bhikkhus], is developed and cultivated, the body is calmed, the mind is calmed, discursive thoughts are quietened, and all wholesome states that partake of supreme knowledge reach fullness of development. What is that one thing? It is mindfulness directed to the body…” AN.I.xxi

Lately I’ve been experiencing a lot of pain due to pressure on some nerves in my left lower neck and left shoulder – a combination of stress and osteo-arthritis, it seems – and I’ve noticed that no matter how intense the pain becomes, I can go inside it. There is nothing to inhibit me going inside the pain to investigate the nature of reality (here in the form of physical pain), except, naturally, my conditioned preferences – the usual “I want…” and “I don’t want…”

Yesterday lying belly down on my chiropractor’s apparatus, arms dangling down at the sides, the pain was particularly severe, and so I went into it and asked the question that I used to guide my child with, when, as a little girl, she had her ‘growing pains’ (or as she called them, “the hurty-bendies”). That is: “Is the awareness itself painful?”

There is the object of awareness – here, it is the pain in the arm – but, right there co-existent with that pain, is awareness-in-itself painful. I couldn’t say ‘yes.’ It was awareness of pain. On ‘its own side’ (so to speak) the awareness was simply open and accomodating of deeper and deeper layers of the pain, until the pain was energy, vibrating energy. I didn’t take the opportunity right then, because too much else was going on; with my body being manipulated by the chiropractor – but, such moments are a good opportunity to inquire into the nature of things. The matter of exactly what is the quality of ‘unpleasant’ prior to or independent of preferences, for example.

And on reflection, there is no doubt that while I was turned towards the pain, rather than wishing it away, the discursive chatter had ended, and some wholesome states bending toward awakening were present, such as: investigation of reality, compassion, concentration.

And, of course, in terms of immediate benefit, the suffering of resisting the pain was absent. Good stuff.

Getting translations in perspective

I’d like to sound a note of warning to seekers who depend on Buddhist translations from the Pali. I crave your patience, if not indulgence for the length of the blog, which eventually gets to the point about translations of Pali texts. The following example was brought to my attention by my dear friend and colleague, Winton Higgins.

At Blue Gum Sangha we’re working through Glenn Wallis’s great little book, ‘Basic Teachings of the Buddha’ and we’ve come to sutta 11, which he names the ‘Destination’ of the Buddhist practice and the path leading to the destination. I’ll quote in full his lovely translation, as he presents it. The Buddha is speaking:

“I will teach the destination and the path leading to the destination. Listen to what I say. What is the destination? The eradication of infatuation, the eradication of hostility, and the eradication of delusion are what is called the destination. And what is the path leading to the destination? Present-moment-awareness directed to the body. This awareness is what is called the path leading to the destination.
In this way, I have taught to you the destination and the path leading to the destination. That which should be done out of compassion by a caring teacher who desires the welfare of his students, I have done for you.
There are secluded places. Meditate, do not be negligent! Don’t have regrets later! This is my instruction to you.”

This is great stuff, especially if, like myself, you have strong faith in mindfulness of the body. The trouble is, the picture is not so simple when we look at this passage in the context from which it has been taken.

This sutta comes from the Samyutta Nikaya, from a section called, ‘Connected Discourses on the Unconditioned,’ and it’s the last passage (or sutta) from 15 (as I count them in Bodhi’s translation). Each section has the same kind of structure, which is (using Wallis’ translation) something like:

“I will teach X and the path leading to X. Listen to what I say. What is X? The eradication of infatuation, the eradication of hostility, and the eradication of delusion (are/is) what is called X. And what is the path leading to X? Y. This is what is called the path leading to X.
In this way, I have taught to you X and the path leading to X. That which should be done out of compassion by a caring teacher who desires the welfare of his students, I have done for you.
There are secluded places. Meditate, do not be negligent! Don’t have regrets later! This is my instruction to you.”

Each of the suttas (except #14) has this same structure, as in Wallis’ translation of the 15th sutta.

So what are the topics in the other fourteen suttas translated by Bodhi, about which the Buddha says, “That which should be done out of compassion by a caring teacher who desires the welfare of his students, I have done for you.” In what follows, I notice that they seem to lead naturally one onto the next. The first 12 present the ‘X’ of our model as the ‘unconditioned’ and they present a dozen versions of the ‘Y’ that leads to the unconditioned.

They are, in order:
1. I will teach you the unconditioned and the path to the unconditioned. What’s that path? Mindfulness directed to the body.
2. I will teach you the unconditioned and the path to the unconditioned. What’s that path? Serenity (samatha) and insight (vipassana).
3. I will teach you the unconditioned and the path to the unconditioned. What’s that path? Concentration with thought and examination; concentration with examination only; concentration without thought and examination.
4. I will teach you the unconditioned and the path to the unconditioned. What’s that path? Emptiness concentration; signless concentration; and undirected [c.mcl: purposeless] concentration.
5. I will teach you the unconditioned and the path to the unconditioned. What’s that path? The four establishments of mindfulness. [c.mcl: That is – Body; vedana (feeling-tones positive, negative and neither); mind-states; and dhammas [c.mcl: the dynamics of reality leading to freedom.]
6. I will teach you the unconditioned and the path to the unconditioned. What’s that path? Thee four right strivings. [c.mcl: maintain wholesome things already arisen; cultivate the future wholesome; drop unwholesome things already arisen; avoid future unwholesome things.
7. I will teach you the unconditioned and the path to the unconditioned. What’s that path? The four bases for spiritual power. [c.mcl: from here on in, it’s getting too complex for this blog entry, so I’ll leave the rest unexplained.]
8. I will teach you the unconditioned and the path to the unconditioned. What’s that path? The five spiritual faculties.
9.I will teach you the unconditioned and the path to the unconditioned. What’s that path? The five powers.
10.I will teach you the unconditioned and the path to the unconditioned. What’s that path? The seven factors of enlightenment.
11. I will teach you the unconditioned and the path to the unconditioned. What’s that path? The noble eightfold path.
12. This passage, or sutta, goes through all the foregoing again: serenity; insight; concentration; four establishments of mindfulness; four right strivings; four bases for spiritual powers; five spiritual faculties; the five powers; seven factors of enlightenment; the noble eightfold path, “maturing in release.”

Again, notice that there is a development from 1 to 12, each going deeper in practice.

13. Then there is a shift. The ‘X’ becomes ‘the uninclined’: “I will teach you the uninclined and the path to the uninclined.” No longer the unconditioned, but the uninclined. What’s the uninclined and the path leading to it? Of course, it’s the same end of infatuation, hostility and delusion; and the text indicates that we should apply all of the forgoing twelve points (the ‘Y’ points) anew to the ‘uninclined.’

14. And then another shift in ‘X’: “I will teach you the taintless and the path to the taintless.” However, for some reason, the Pali doesn’t suggest the application of the first twelve approaches. Here, instead, the Buddha lists many inspiring synonyms for the taintless, nirvana. There’s a change in the pattern of the text. Perhaps in a separate blog entry I’ll list all the synonyms.

15. And lastly, the subject of this entry, and the passage that Wallis presents: “I will teach you the destination and the path to the destination.” Here, the Pali indicates that we need to apply to this sutta about the ‘destination’ all of those first twelve points! (It does this with the equivalent of the English ‘etc’. (Pali: pe) The destination (‘X’) is to be understood in terms of the path, mindfulness of the body (‘Y’), as defined by all twelve points, not just in terms of ‘mindfulness of the body’.

So, what’s the point of all this? It seems to me that the Buddha is saying, “Practice that begins with ‘mindfulness of the body,’ and proceeds on the basis of mindfulness of the body, includes all these – points 1-12 – as the path.” And, he’s saying by detailing all those points, that practice is, naturally enough, developmental, of course.

However, Wallis in his generally helpful little book, ‘Basic teachings of the Buddha,’ makes no mention of those other ‘paths’ (the ‘Y’s which are mentioned in the Pali sutta context); he only quotes “mindfulness of the body” as the path in this chapter of his book and in his subsequent commentary.

Personally, I think that is a possible approach, and it’s the subject of this blog, isn’t it? However, it’s a good approach only if we include the qualification that serious mindfulness of the body implies so much more than a physical body (that is, all the other points in the ‘Connected Discourses on the Unconditioned.)’ That is, we should indicate that ‘mindfulness of the body’ is naturally going to lead to, all the other more-than-body conditions – the states of concentration (jhanas), the mindfuless of dhammas, exceptional mind-powers, the noble eightfold path, and the rest. The body is a cognitive body (and/or a mind-made body) and a site for cultivation of the heart-mind to an extraordinary depth of subtle self-realisation.

Wallis makes clear in his commentary that he is trying to distance himself from approaches that “state the goal in terms of some dissolution into or union with some Absolute.” (p.136) He also says, “More psychologically or epistemologically-oriented traditions – that is, those traditions that emphasis an understanding of the mind and the importance of particular knowledge – tend to state the goal in terms of liberation from a limited self or release from the constraints of ignorance.” In distancing himself from this, he holds up, in this chapter, instead, ‘mindfulness of the body’ as the destination of the practice.

There’s a danger here of over-simplification, and we need to be careful of a kind of reductionism. Perhaps here the translator could have said some more about the context of this passage, for our guidance?

It’s a difficult thing for us, that we depend on translations for ‘the word of the Buddha,’ however, the good side to this is that it means we always have to come back to where it matters – our experiencing – to continue the quest for, and our development into, the kind of intuitive understanding of life that the Buddha indicated.

Passage from Glenn Wallis

I’ve been thinking about a passage that Glenn Wallis translates, and soon I’ll make some comments. Here is the passage, though, ahead of my comments, to come soon:

“I will teach the destination and the path leading to the destination. Listen to what I say. What is the destination? The eradication of infatuation, the eradication of hostility, and the eradication of delusion are what is called the destination. And what is the path leading to the destination? Present-moment-awareness directed to the body. This awareness is what is called the path leading to the destination.
In this way, I have taught to you the destination and the path leading to the destination. That which should be done out of compassion by a caring teacher who desires the welfare of his students, I have done for you.
There are secluded places. Meditate, do not be negligent! Don’t have regrets later! This is my instruction to you.”

the art of meditation: the body

Talking about ‘gut feelings,’ I recommend Paramananda little book (Windhorse Publications) called, ‘the body,’ especially if you are a focusing-style meditator. Without any indication that he knows of Gendlin’s work, he has written a book that I find compatible with inclusion of the ‘felt sense’ in my meditative life. It is certainly a book that fosters trust in our body’s intuitive knowing.

Gut Feelings

I’m reading a book called ‘Gut Feelings’ at the moment. An enjoyable read by Gerd Gigerenzer. I find it interesting that in my first couple of chapters there is no mention of the body. There is lots of mention of a certain organ in the body; that is, the brain. So, how does he define ‘gut feelings’? He uses ‘gut feeling,’ ‘intuition’ and ‘hunch’ interchangeably (p.16) “to refer to a judgment

  1. that appears quickly in consciousness,
  2. whose underlying reasons we are not fully aware of, and
  3. is strong enough to act upon.”

This is pretty good, and there are lots of good cognitive psych stories in the book, good experiments, supporting the theory that much that is important about us and our decision-making goes on out of sight. However, I thought, “Can this be, that he doesn’t know about Gendlin’s ‘felt sense’ and that he doesn’t include the body below the neck in this ‘intuition’ field?” I’ll read on and let you know, but when I go to the index, there is no entry for ‘body.’ (And no mention of Gendlin anywhere.)

This is strange to me, especially when in other places I’ve read of the discovery of ‘brain’ cells in the heart and in the stomach; in other words, in the gut. But most of all, because mindfulness of the body produces a direct realisation of the role of the body below the neck in intuitive life.

Senses Portals for the MInd

In the classical summary of the processes which make up a human, the Buddha didn’t include the six senses in the first ‘aggregate’, the body. The later Theravadans made the senses more physical than they were in the early suttas, says Sue Hamilton in her Identity and Experience: the Constitution of the Human Being According to Early Buddhism. The senses in the early Buddhist literature are not contacted via the aggregate called the ‘body.’

This makes sense to me. When at any time of the day I do a simple exercise to find my presence, it goes something like this: “Firstly, relax the body. Next, relax the breath. And, now, relax the senses.” When I get to this ‘senses’ part, I notice that this automatically means an entry into the kind of ‘space’ that we call ‘the mind,’ not more into the so-called physical body. When I rest into this resultant ‘spaciousness’ curiously, I can notice that ‘the senses’ are all there in the space together; they aren’t separated in their conventional channels – they interpenetrate. One way of saying this might be to say: they partake of the same source, a unified ground state of consciousness.

This brings a new perspective on the injunction to ‘guard the senses.’ The senses need to be guarded because they are so directly portals to the spacious, luminous mind, the ‘citta.’ As such, the senses may be thought of as a liminal space which is neither body, nor non-body. Hence, they get a mention as domains of awareness in the citta, not as functions of the body.

Some Questions

Before we go too much further there are some things to name that will need our consideration soon enough. Because there are so many things that have come to me since starting this blog, that I think I should list some of them, in the hope of addressing them soon.

In wanting to write about the role of the body in Buddhist meditation practice, we can ask: What is the body that they speak of here? Is it one ‘ thing’? Even if we consider the body a collection of processes, does their ‘aggregation’ come in only one modality? Will one meaning of the word ‘body’ suffice? What if there are a number of different experiences, or kinds of experiences, that the word ‘body’ indicates, indicating levels of bodily experiencing? I think this is the case, and I will have more to say about this as I explore the theme.

Another matter that needs clarification is how I’ll view the age-old red herring called “the body-mind dualism.” There are confusing and, indeed, discouraging views abroad in the Western Buddhist community about this, is students of meditation being encouraged to avoid me ‘Cartesian dualism’ of separate mind and body. For the moment let me comment that the Buddha used a particular term which is helpful in this respect: “body with consciousness.” (saviññāṇa kāya) ”Then, Sariputta, you must train yourself as follows. In this mind and body, or anything external to it, there is no notion of ‘I’ or ‘mine.’” (Trans: Sue Hamilton). The pharase, ‘mind and body’ is meant to point us to our direct experience, and wasn’t intended to set up fixed philosophical categories. (By the way, this quote puts to rest the biased, sectarian, rhetorical and imprecise notion that Theravādans only realise the selflessness of persons, and not that of the environment. “ ..Or anything external to it,” says the Pali text.)

An important matter to clarify, too, is the relationship of what we call the senses to the notions of body (usually rūpa and kāya) in the Pali texts. As a simple experiment, try this is threefold deepening practice: Relax the body for a few minutes; then relax your breathing for a few minutes; then relax your senses (all at once). Is there a difference between ‘relaxing the body’ and ‘relaxing the senses’? Can you find your words (ignoring public meanings) for the difference? Are the senses, in fact, and speaking conventionally for now, more a matter of ‘mind’ than of ‘body’?

Page 3 of 4

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén